
Verbal
punches were thrown, and the New Hampshire audience booed as though
they were at a bare-knuckle brawl during ABC’s Saturday-night Republican
debate. Marco Rubio was on the receiving end of some of the most
punishing blows. The debate began like a bad
Saturday Night Live
sketch, with Ben Carson jamming up the entryway to the stage by
refusing to take his place at the podium. Donald Trump added to the
logjam, reducing Jeb Bush to squirming his way around Trump and Carson.
Why did this happen? Apparently Carson didn’t hear his name called, and
ABC’s bumbling at getting the men out of the cattle chute was certainly a
funny way to start things off, lending the proceedings a clownish tone.That
tone changed abruptly once everyone was finally coaxed into their
spots, however. After Rubio dodged a question about his experience in
the Senate by bringing up President Obama and batting him around, Chris
Christie chastised Rubio, calling Rubio’s spiel a “memorized 30-second
speech where you talk about how great America is [and it] doesn’t help
one person.” How did Rubio respond?
By repeating the same 30-second speech,
nearly word-for-word. Remarkably, Rubio did the exact same thing a few
minutes later. The effect was to leave a viewer thinking Rubio is either
obsessed with his Obama rhetoric, or that he was at a loss as to how to
improvise clear answers. For a man who, going into this debate, was
seen as an up-and-coming challenger to frontrunners Trump and Cruz, the
debate represented some fizzled steam. Trump
was booed by the audience when he tried to stop a Bush criticism of
him. “Let me talk — quiet,” commanded Trump, putting a finger to his
lips as one might shush a noisy child. The crowd did not like that
condescending move. Trump, ever-unpredictable, responded with something I
haven’t seen before: He
attacked the studio audience, suggesting that the hall was full of “donors” who were unhappy that he, Trump, doesn’t take donations. So the audience booed
that.
It was a crazy-fox strategy: risk alienating the relatively few people
in the auditorium in order to regale the millions watching at home. Not
sure how that plays to New Hampshire citizens voting on Tuesday.The
tumult of the debate was due solely to the candidates themselves; the
debate’s primary moderators, David Muir and Martha Raddatz, were mostly
tedious questioners, too often quoting one candidate’s accusation
against another, and asking for a response. Why couldn’t Muir and
Raddatz come up with their own accusations? And while there were current
issues that could have been raised for discussion at some length — the
Flint, Mich., water crisis, for example — the moderators reached for a
different kind of water issue: the use of waterboarding. All
this did was provide Trump an occasion to puff up and deliver a
bellicose, “I’d bring back waterboarding, and I’d being back a helluva
lot
worse than waterboarding!” This was moderating in a manner that enlightened no one.By
any measure, you’d have to say that John Kasich, Christie, and Bush
helped themselves the most this night, launching pointed rejoinders at
frontrunners Trump, Cruz, and Rubio, garnering more spontaneous applause
than those three governors have attracted in any debate to date. By the
end, as the candidates milled around the stage hugging their relatives
and signing autographs, Rubio looked a bit dazed, as though he’d been
sucker-punched. Thus the debate began in confusion and ended in
bafflement.
No comments:
Post a Comment
publisher,advertisement,fun,cool,interesting,news,travelling,football